Why does all the awesome stuff happen when you're busiest? Here are some local happenings that I sincerely hope I get to participate in this November.
Science Fiction and Fantasy Author Event
Who: Todd McCaffrey, John Joseph Adams, Nalo Hopkinson, David Sander
When: Saturday, November 12th, 11:00 AM-2:00 PM
Where: Brea Library (http://ocpl.org/libloc/brea)
Cost: Free
Blurb: "Meet
popular science fiction and fantasy authors! Join us for a special science
fiction and fantasy event featuring guest speakers and a moderated panel. This
program is provided by an Arisia Incorporated grant and is sponsored by the
Friends of the Brea Library."
My Thoughts: Even though I haven't read these authors (I'm so bad, I know), I would love to go and see famous fantasy writers.
Pride and Prejudice--the Play
Who: Cal-State Fullerton Drama Department
When: November 4-20, 2016
Where: Young Theatre, Cal-State Fullerton (http://www.fullerton.edu/arts/theatre/events/td_productions.php)
Cost: $14
Blurb: "The
beloved Jane Austen returns to the CSUF stage in this refreshingly fast-paced,
witty and wildly romantic new adaptation. Finding a husband is hardly
independent-minded Elizabeth’s most urgent priority. However, with four
sisters, an overzealous match-making mother, and a string of unsuitable
suitors, it’s difficult to escape the subject. When she meets the handsome but
enigmatic Mr. Darcy, she is determined not to let her feelings triumph over her
own good sense – but the truth turns out to be slipperier than it seems.
Is it possible for Elizabeth and Darcy to look beyond his pride and her
prejudice, and to make the best match of all?"
My Thoughts: Pride and Prejudice is one of my favorite books and I would love to see it in play form. I might want to splurge on it.
National Novel Writing Month, a.k.a. Nanowrimo
Who: Writers of all ages and levels of experience
When: November
Where: All over the country (nanowrimo.org)
Cost: Free
Blurb: "National
Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) is a fun, seat-of-your-pants approach to
creative writing. On November 1, participants begin
working towards the goal of writing a 50,000-word novel by 11:59 PM on November
30.Valuing enthusiasm, determination, and a deadline, NaNoWriMo is for anyone
who has ever thought about writing a novel."
My Thought: I participate in this every year, sometimes multiple times a year, although I'm not necessarily orthodox about it; I may get 50,000 words (200 pages) written in a month, but rarely do I complete a novel. Last year, I did an open Nanowrimo, writing blogs, sending inspirational quotes, inviting everyone to join. This year, I think it will be more casual. My group the Pendragons will be writing in Panera and that's about it. Still, if you want to do Nanowrimo, there are groups all over the area. Check out the website and consider dropping in on one.
Here are my old blog posts on winning Nanowrimo:
Showing posts with label Pride and Prejudice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pride and Prejudice. Show all posts
Monday, October 24, 2016
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Tricksy Titles
Titles are supposed to grab a reader's attention, inform her of the book's genre, and sum up the contents of 400 pages--all at the same time. That's a lot of responsibility for 2-5 words to bear. Little wonder then, that some titles manage to give certain readers a completely wrong impression of what the book's actually about.
Here are classic titles that mixed me up.
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
What I thought it was about: A solemn treatise on racism in the post-Civil war south. Tragic, powerful, moralizing, with nothing much happening for 200 pages.
What it turned out to be: An addictive romance with a satirical bite set in Regency England. Mr. Darcy has too much pride, Elizabeth Bennett has too much prejudice, and as they fall for each other, they learn their faults and strive to overcome them.
Watership Down by Richard Adams
What I thought it was about: A sinking ship, obviously. Either the whole story is leading to the ship sinking (like the Titanic) or the ship sinks in the beginning, leading the characters to face a survival situation.
What it turned out to be: An epic adventure revolving around... say it with me now... rabbits. Yes, rabbits. After a prophetic bunny named Fiver has a vision of their warren's destruction, his brother Hazel leads a ragtag group to find a new home. The place they eventually settle is called Watership Down--hence the title.
The Life of Pi by Yann Martel
What I thought it was about: Either a nonfiction book about the history of 3.14 or a literary tale about a mathematician obsessed with 3.14. Maybe said mathematician finds love and learns life lessons--but clearly no one is in serious danger.
What it turned out to be: A boy named Pi and a tiger survive on a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean. This one should have been called Watership Down. At least it had a sinking ship in it.
The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger
What I thought it was about: ? ? ? I'm used to classic books using metaphors for their titles (To Kill a Mockingbird, A Clockwork Orange) but in this case I literally couldn't tell what the metaphor was supposed to be. My brain, in its infinite kookiness, ended up with a cross between a Venus Fly Trap and my least favorite loaf of bread.
What it turned out to be: High-schooler Holden Caulfield whines about phonies, wanders around, and spends his entire savings while accomplishing nothing. At one point toward the end of the book, he has a vivid image of a group of children playing in a rye field near the edge of the cliff. He wants to catch them before they fall off. Yeah, I can't imagine why I didn't get this title. It's so obvious.
Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach
What I thought it was about: Literary fiction just loves to couch its title in metaphor. That's how they lure you into reading it--you want to know what they're talking about. (I'm talking to you, Catcher in the Rye!) I didn't know what the seagull referred to, but one thing was sure there was 0% chance that the main character was a gull.
What it turned out to be: Apparently, I was wrong.
What about you? Any titles that tricked you?
Here are classic titles that mixed me up.
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
What I thought it was about: A solemn treatise on racism in the post-Civil war south. Tragic, powerful, moralizing, with nothing much happening for 200 pages.
What it turned out to be: An addictive romance with a satirical bite set in Regency England. Mr. Darcy has too much pride, Elizabeth Bennett has too much prejudice, and as they fall for each other, they learn their faults and strive to overcome them.
Watership Down by Richard Adams
What I thought it was about: A sinking ship, obviously. Either the whole story is leading to the ship sinking (like the Titanic) or the ship sinks in the beginning, leading the characters to face a survival situation.
What it turned out to be: An epic adventure revolving around... say it with me now... rabbits. Yes, rabbits. After a prophetic bunny named Fiver has a vision of their warren's destruction, his brother Hazel leads a ragtag group to find a new home. The place they eventually settle is called Watership Down--hence the title.
The Life of Pi by Yann Martel
What I thought it was about: Either a nonfiction book about the history of 3.14 or a literary tale about a mathematician obsessed with 3.14. Maybe said mathematician finds love and learns life lessons--but clearly no one is in serious danger.
What it turned out to be: A boy named Pi and a tiger survive on a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean. This one should have been called Watership Down. At least it had a sinking ship in it.
The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger
What I thought it was about: ? ? ? I'm used to classic books using metaphors for their titles (To Kill a Mockingbird, A Clockwork Orange) but in this case I literally couldn't tell what the metaphor was supposed to be. My brain, in its infinite kookiness, ended up with a cross between a Venus Fly Trap and my least favorite loaf of bread.
What it turned out to be: High-schooler Holden Caulfield whines about phonies, wanders around, and spends his entire savings while accomplishing nothing. At one point toward the end of the book, he has a vivid image of a group of children playing in a rye field near the edge of the cliff. He wants to catch them before they fall off. Yeah, I can't imagine why I didn't get this title. It's so obvious.
Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach
What I thought it was about: Literary fiction just loves to couch its title in metaphor. That's how they lure you into reading it--you want to know what they're talking about. (I'm talking to you, Catcher in the Rye!) I didn't know what the seagull referred to, but one thing was sure there was 0% chance that the main character was a gull.
What it turned out to be: Apparently, I was wrong.
What about you? Any titles that tricked you?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)